ShipSafeScan vs Scanner C at a glance
| Feature | ShipSafeScan | Scanner C |
|---|---|---|
| Main focus | Security and quality score for AI-coded repos | Static analysis (SAST) for code vulnerabilities |
| How you run it | Paste a repo URL in the browser, no install | Command-line or CI, with a hosted platform option |
| Sign-up to scan a public repo | No sign-up | No sign-up for the open-source tool |
| Price | Free for public repos | Open-source engine free; paid platform tiers |
| Custom rules | Fixed deterministic rule set | Yes, write and share custom rules |
| Single shareable scorecard | Yes, score plus a shareable image | Findings output, no combined score by default |
Scanner C refers to an open-source static-analysis (SAST) engine with an extensible rule set. Details reflect that tool category as reviewed on 2026-09-15. Tool features change over time. If you spot something out of date, please let us know.
Where Scanner C is stronger
Deep, extensible SAST rules
Scanner C is a dedicated static-analysis engine with a large rule set and the ability to write custom rules for your codebase. Its vulnerability coverage goes deeper than ShipSafeScan's fixed rule set.
Platform features for teams
Scanner C offers a hosted platform with team workflows and triage. ShipSafeScan is a single-scan tool without a team management layer.
When ShipSafeScan is the better fit
Use ShipSafeScan when you want a fast, no-install score for an AI-coded app, including leaked secrets and repo health in one result. A SAST engine is the better fit when you need deep, customizable static analysis wired into a team pipeline.
ShipSafeScan vs Scanner C: frequently asked questions
Does ShipSafeScan do the same static analysis as a SAST engine?
Not to the same depth. A SAST engine offers extensible rules and deep vulnerability coverage. ShipSafeScan runs a fixed deterministic rule set and combines the result into a single security and quality score, which is a lighter, faster read.
Which should I use for an AI-coded app?
For a quick no-install score covering secrets and repo health, ShipSafeScan is fast to run. For deep, customizable vulnerability analysis in CI, a SAST engine is stronger. They address different needs and can be combined.
Compare with another tool
This comparison describes categories of security tools, not specific named products. Any resemblance to a particular tool is for general guidance only. ShipSafeScan is independent and not affiliated with any other tool.